Bob Vander Plaats and Huck PAC

This is an extension of abregar’s post yesterday in which he announced his support of Bob Vander Plaats for governor.  I would also like to throw my support behind BVP because of various reasons.  I am certain he will not sell out the fiscal conservatives or the social conservatives; he is rock solid in both of these areas.  He realizes the importance of the platform and the grassroots.  If he did not, Mike Huckabee would not have been the Iowa Caucus winner.  He brings to the table both business and education experience.  Our state is in a financial crises, and has schools that used to be first in the nation but now are struggling to compete.  Vander Plaats has experience dealing with the issues Iowa is facing.  The argument against him running for governor is that he has lost two previous elections, but maybe it’s Iowa that lost and not Bob Vander Plaats.

Abregar also stated in his post that there would be a flood of support behind Vander Plaats because of his success with the Mike Huckabee campaign.  Huckabee just launched at the beginning of the month Huck PAC’s National Volunteer Team, which I posted about earlier.  This is a nationwide grassroots organization that is dedicated to electing conservatives in every state.  I am one of the Iowa Grassroots Coordinators for Huck PAC and I can tell you that the support for the conservative issues that Huck PAC embodies, such as fiscal responsibility, limited government, family, and life, is alive and kicking here in Iowa.  Most certainly this group will be actively engaged in the Vander Plaats’ campaign and will work relentlessly for his election.

If you would like to keep up with Huck PAC Iowa, please join the facebook group.  If you would also like to become an active volunteer for the conservative issues in our state, sign up here.

The Sioux City Journal is currently doing a “sound off” about Bob VanderPlaats’ run for governor which will be displayed in their report tomorrow.  Please go here and leave positive  comments on why you support his campaign.

The rush to shush Rush

I will openly admit that I am a new fan of Rush Limbaugh. I tune in to his show every chance I get. Some things about Rush just amaze me- his amazing self-image of himself, his ego, his humor. Rush has disappointed me, yes even angered me, with his views of Mike Huckabee, yet for the most part I have come to appreciate and value the discussion Rush shares with listeners about what is happening in American politics.

Rush Limbaugh. There seems to be a war waged. It is Limbaugh vs Obama. Limbaugh vs Democrats. Limbaugh vs the media. My opinion is also Conservative Americans in a battle with Obama, the Democrats, and the liberal media.

For starters, in the Sunday Des Moines Register I found a column by Leonard Pitts.  Pitts compares Limbaugh to “a clown in the media circus” and went on to say that “trailing behind, like the folks with brooms trail the elephants in a circus parade, Limbaugh’s devotees…”

and then there is my old, cranky buddy (NOT) Chris Matthews weighing in on the latest from Limbaugh.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Up next, does Rush Limbaugh hate this country? Wait till you hear what he said about the new president. He wants him to fail. What an amazing-, I’ve never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail. Usually you want the new president to succeed and then later on you argue the politics of what he or she does. But to want them to fail at the outset? What’s that about?

Later in his “Sideshow” segment Matthews aired a sound bite from Limbaugh and then snidely remarked: “Well Rush must have a lot of acorns squirreled away not to share everyone else’s hopes that the economy does come back.”

And, finally I share what the democrats are up to to squash the voice of Rush Limbaugh.

Dems Launch Online Petition Against Rush Limbaugh

Pitts accuses “Limbaugh and the other clowns” of being angry and wanting to “strangle” President Obama’s presidency.

Let’s get this right – because there are Americans who do not like the path we are taking to socialism and selling our souls and heaping on an almost unfathomable debt on our children and future generations we are all put in the category of brooming up elephant dung?

Matthews has “never heard anybody say they wanted a new president to fail.”

Where was Matthews when Bush became President? Can he ignore his Obama-shivers long enough to admit that he spent his time out to get President Bush? We only are told to give our respect to Democrat Presidents?

Obama and the Democrats express “outrage” that Rush would not buy into Obama-mania, hook-line-sinker!

Why should we care about what happens to Rush Limbaugh? Two words: Fairness Doctrine.

And, while I am at it, I can see the writing on the Obama Wall- the media and Obama network are already putting in to place the leverage to take on anyone who would speak out in opposition to Obama. Pay attention to the stimulus package debate. Which of our Senators and Representatives will have the courage to speak out against what Obama and the Democrats wish to ram through to become another part of the Great American Sellout?

Freedom of Speech is being threatened as I type. The threat is being helped along by the likes of Leonard Pitts, Chris Matthews, and the Democrat machine. I fear that Americans are so busy trying to pay the bills and keep ahead of the daily dose of gloom and doom economical news that we will not make our voices heard.

And one day… only the voices of Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, Matthews will be heard because the rest of us will be silenced because we will not dare to have a different opinion.

Readers of my post may or may not like Rush Limbaugh but surely you value your freedom to be heard. Surely you do not wish to be labeled as hating your country because you do not like what is happening to the America that you know and love.

Time to sign off- Rush will soon be invited into my home via the radio. Better listen while I can.

 

Vander Plaats for Governor

Bob Vander Plaats is the best chance for the Iowa GOP to take back the Governors mansion in 2010. I know some anonymous hack out there is going to be chuckling at my previous statement, but I am serious. It is easy for anyone to see that the Democrats and Culver in particular have dug a very deep hole for our state. Now it is up to the Republicans to wrest control away from the Democrats and return some common sense to our state government.

Now I will explain why I think that Vander Plaats is our best chance to retake the (Terrace) Hill. There are really only five Republicans in the state that have the name recognition that may be able to take down the big lug. Two of those individuals are Steve King and Tom Latham. We really can’t afford to lose those two seats to the Democrats. So I would urge both of these representatives to stay the course and fight for common sense in Washington. Charles Grassley is probably the best liked Republican our state has to offer, but the downfall here is his age. Far too many Iowans’ would look at his age as a disqualifier. Doug Gross is the fourth Republican with tremendous name recognition, but a portion of the base doesn’t trust him. I don’t know what other asset’s he would be able to bring to a battle with Culver and the Democrats.

This leaves Bob Vander Plaats. This is a man that helped organize a successful caucus campaign from nothing. When Mike Huckabee threw his hat into the ring for the presidential race he was an unknown. He had no name recognition when his campaign in Iowa began. In steps Vander Plaats. He helped build up the grassroots network that propelled Mike to his caucus victory. You can rest assured that Huckabee will return the favor. Only instead of bringing just himself to Iowa to campaign, he will be bringing nationwide contacts and donors to help Vander Plaats win. Huckabee will bring national attention to our gubernatorial race in a way that has never been seen before. He will bring Huck PAC to the battle. He will bring Huck’s Army to the battle. Basically Vander Plaats will have resources available to him that no other candidate will be able to match.

“Aides say Culver will not lease lottery”…

Interesting stuff in the Sunday newspapers- almost too much take in but callmecrusader will take a stab at it! Where to start? Let’s see… I guess with Charles Krogmeier, Chet Culver’s chief of staff. My, my, in the Mike Glover piece Krogmeier is just full of pointing the finger at Republicans. In the brief portion I share here Krogmeier “accused Republicans” twice. He was on a Democrat roll. Yes, the article did start out that Krogmeier said “bluntly” that Culver would not include plans to sell or least the lottery. Add that to accusing pundits and partisans giving the potential selling of the lottery “more attention than it deserves” got one lowly blogger rather irritated.

I beg to differ with Krogmeier. It is when pundits, bloggers, and average tax paying Iowans DO NOT pay attention that something like the lottery gets snuck in on us at the last minute. We can not afford to let our guard down and assume that the Governor and his hired staff will not pull a fast one on us.

Enter David Yepsen and his D. M. Sunday Register column. I think Yepsen says it well when he writes that a lottery sale could happen “some late April night…. after the sun goes down.”

Krogmeier can whine and complain. He can point fingers at all sorts of people but the watch dogs and even middle aged bloggers are on the issue of selling the lottery like a tick on a dog. You see, there is such a lack of trust out in the farms, towns and cities of Iowa that name calling and protests do nothing to deter worried Iowans from paying attention to what is going on as Krogmeier describes as “upstairs (in the Legislature).”

If Krogmeier and others took any time at all to listen to Iowans they would know that we want responsible budgeting not quick fix ideas. This concept seems to be over the heads of the big spenders in Des Moines. And this is why bloggers and others are spending time and energy to pay attention to what goes on upstairs, downstairs, and behind closed doors. We are watching and what this blogger sees is buddies and money and power. As one who grew up on an Iowa farm I can say with some authority: IT STINKS!

 

Culver Intent on Crippling Iowa’s Future

It is official, Governor Culver is desperate. Culver and the Democrat dominated Iowa Government have spent themselves and the State of Iowa into a corner. They have racked up an approximately $700 million dollar deficit. The problem is that they have no idea how alleviate the problem. All they know how to do is spend money with no clue how to save money. He has run into a political logjam. He knows that if he raises taxes he will have effectively ended his political career. He knows that borrowing the money will have a very large negative effect on his reelection bid so he is attempting to find some other way to offset the amount that he would need to borrow. First he attempted to lease the Iowa Lottery to wealthy campaign donors. Thanks to the exposure that the plan received the public outcry caused him to dismiss the idea. Now however Culver is considering selling Iowa’s prison farms.
Iowa’s prison farms are a vital part of Iowa’s prison system. The farms are a means of offsetting the operating expenses of the prison system as well as a method of rehabilitation. Selling them would most certainly have a detrimental effect on the prison system in Iowa. Currently the farms are used to offset the operating cost of the prison system. Without them the cost of running our state prisons will most assuredly rise.

The farms do provide another benefit as well. They provide the state with another option when it comes to the rehabilitation of prisoners. By selling the farms it will deny many prisoners the opportunity to redeem themselves. The state will then need to turn to other means of rehabilitation, and most likely means that will increase the operating cost of the prison system as a whole.

In his desperation to save his political career, Culver is trying to sneak as much by us as he can. First it was the lottery, now it is this. What is the next target of Culver’s irresponsibility? Perhaps he will try to sell Iowa’s roadways? Or maybe the capital building? Call your State Senator and you State Representatives to tell them no to selling Iowa’s revenue generating assets. Tell them that it will only serve to cripple Iowa in the future.

Huckabee speaks out to stop Geithner nomination

I am sharing information from Mike Huckabee about the Geithner nomination for Treasury Secretary. Huckabee makes great points and suggestions that I can not communicate any better. I am hoping that readers of this post will take time to focus on what Mike Huckabee has to say and if they agree will take the necessary steps to make their voices heard, LOUD AND CLEAR!

President Obama has every right to select the people he wants and trusts for his cabinet, but the United States Senate has not only the right, but the Constitutional responsibility to make sure those selections are in the best interest of the United States. Senators may not like some of his selections, but shouldn’t oppose them due to purely political reasons. There ought to be something that fundamentally disqualifies a person from being confirmed. In the case of Treasury designee Timothy Geithner, they have an issue that should force President Obama to give us a better choice.

As I’ve said, you shouldn’t RUN the IRS if you have a history of running from it.

I’m sure he’s a nice man and has many endearing qualities, but not paying $34,000 in personal taxes and then saying “oops” doesn’t cut it. It doesn’t work that way for you.

I urge you to email or call your Senator this weekend or first thing Monday and let him or her know that giving Geithner a job as Treasury secretary is an insult to every citizen who pays his or her taxes on time. Call every talk tadio program you can and speak out. Go to the blogosphere and urge action on the part of other citizens who are outraged that a many who fails to pay his taxes will get a salary that YOUR taxes pay for. You can go to my website mikehuckabee.com and find the link to the contact information for the members of the Senate.

Go to your computer or your phone. Do it now. Let your voice be heard. If you don’t speak out, then you are saying it’s okay for the people who run the tax system to skip paying what you have to pay. You might be a strong supporter of President Obama and I’m not asking you to stop-I’m asking you to join me in asking the Senators of our nation to not do disservice to the President and the taxpayers by confirming Timothy Geithner to being Secretary of the Treasury.

Email or call now….the vote on him may be as early as Monday. There is time to stop it.

HF 14:UNDERMINING ENGLISH

http://www.legis.state.ia.us/GA/79GA/Legislation/SF/00100/SF00165/Current.html.  In 2002 the Iowa English Language Reaffirmation Act was signed into law by then- Governor Tom Vilsack. This law states unequivocally that most local and state government proceedings as well as documents and publications be conducted and written in English.

Since it was passed, this law affirming English has been unpopular with many Iowans, including Governor Chet Culver and a number of members of the legislature. One of them,  Democrat Bruce Hunter, District 69 Representative, was inspired to sponsor bill HF 14 http://www.legis.state.ia.us/aspx/Cool-ICE/DisplayBills.htm which repeals the English Language Reaffirmation Act.

Hunter maintains that the English Language Reaffirmation Act makes Iowans look bad to the immigrant community and also to folks in the rest of the nation— this despite the fact that more than half the states (twenty six) in the union have English official language laws http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jwcrawford/langleg.htm. According to the Des Moines Register, Culver is on record as saying the reaffirmation law of 2002 does not move our state forward. Evidently our secretary of state Mauro agrees with Culver, as during his tenure he has made available voter registration forms in at least four languages besides English.

I have a few concerns about this issue:

Our nation was not founded by people who spoke German or French or Italian or Spanish, or any other language, but primarily by people whose native tongue was English. Like it or not, our nation at its inception had a strong tradition in England, not only in the language but in the social and political culture of that country. Should we as U.S. citizens be asked to repudiate roots that (even if they do not belong to each of us as  individuals) are the roots of our nation?

Over the years,  one of the essential ways that non-English speaking immigrants assimilated effectively into our country was by learning our language. That’s right: our language that is spoken on our soil and that is the language of our Constitution, our government and our marketplace. Historically the majority of immigrants who have had the most success in this country are those who have become most fluent in English. Conscientious immigrants knew they needed to learn English  in order to conduct business and life outside the family, and so…they learned English! English became an important element of their lives in that it helped bind them to this country and to the ways in which they made their livelihood.

I believe that we need to respect English as the binding language of our nation. For their own good, every U.S. citizen (or anybody who chooses to live here, for that matter) should have the desire and ability to speak, write, and understand English because they will be happier and more successful if they do. The problem is that government does not encourage this to happen by enabling people to such an extent that they no longer NEED to learn.

The strongest motivation to learn anything is necessity, i.e. BECAUSE YOU MUST. I have talked to many people who are expert in foreign languages and when I asked them how they learned to speak and write and read  so well, the response more often than not was, “I lived in that country.” I would hope that anybody who comes to the U.S. will take advantage of the opportunity to learn English that living in our country offers, because it will be one of the best opportunities to learn the language they will ever receive. Living in a foreign country beats taking a foreign language class any day of the week.

Meanwhile, if you agree that we need to keep the law to reaffirm the English language on the books, contact your state representative or senator http://www.legis.state.ia.us/aspx/Legislators/LegislatorInfo.aspx and ask them to oppose HF 14.

Also contact Bruce Hunter, who sponsored  HF 14   http://www3.legis.state.ia.us/ga/member.do?id=317&ga=83.

Bill HF 14 is currently in the House State Government Committee and you may contact its members http://www3.legis.state.ia.us/ga/committee.do?id=29.

Thus far many lobbyists involved with the bill are undecided as to whether it has merit. http://coolice.legis.state.ia.us/Cool-ICE/default.aspCategory=Lobbyist&Service=DspReport&ga=83&type=b&hbill=HF14 .

And Republican Dave Heaton (Representative from District 91) and House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen have spoken out against it.

Bill HF 14 has a way to go before Governor Culver can sign it. But one thing is certain,  if it is presented to him,  Culver will sign it.

And on a personal note: Never again do I want to walk into my town’s public library and see signs displaying book categories in Spanish. Apart from the fact the signs looked ludicrous in a library full of books written in English, I had to chuckle at the thought that if people can’t read the word “History” above the shelf, maybe they are not quite ready to  read the history books themselves! And they never will be as long as the government maintains its misguided translation initiatives.

Aretha Franklin’s hat

Luke Song with Aretha Franklin's hat

Given that it is a Friday night and that many people probably won’t spend the time to read new IDA blogs, I have decided to post on Aretha Franklin’s Inauguration hat! Personally, I liked the hat and thought Franklin was one of the few people with common sense to wear a hat for warmth, not to mention for style!

I have several hats but nothing like Aretha’s, probably because I don’t have an extra $500 to spare! But, then I don’t have the voice of Aretha, often saying I am not church choir material. Anyway, enjoy the article!

READ THE STIMULUS DOT ORG

Yes, there really is a website which has been set up so all of us can read the latest bill concocted under the troubled Troubled Assets Relief Program. My advice to everybody is to go there and peruse all 258 pages (and growing) of this monstrosity. Because it seems by the time they pass this bill, most of our lawmakers won’t have read very much if any of it themselves and some of us might as well be vaguely informed as to what it’s all about.

I am not going to pretend I have digested all I read and in fact much of it I’ve only skimmed in order to get the general picture. But here is the gist of it: if this enormous bill passes– and it looks as if it will short of divine intervention or total and relentless outrage 24/7 on the part of innocent taxpayers– rest assured that our federal government will be able to say to every single one of us “Gotcha covered!” And I mean covered. If this bill passes, it does not seem to me there will be many aspects of my life where federal and/ or state and/ or local government won’t be putting money in my hand, albeit indirectly, and trying to protect me even when I’m not holding my hand out. This is very disturbing.

The overall plan is to flood pretty much every existing government agency you’ve ever heard of with “stimulation.” It seems the government is planning to spend billions of dollars to construct a spider’s web of state and local hubs with the purpose of creating projects and jobs. Until the jobs provide enough prosperity, or if they never do, the hubs will dispense money and services to maintain people’s health and welfare.

My goodness, I had no idea so many government agencies were in need of shoring up! There’s the Dept. of The Interior, the Dept. of Justice, the Dept of Labor, the Dept of Agriculture, the Dept of Commerce, the Dept. of Transportation, the EPA, Health and Human Services, FHA, BLM, Fish and Wildlife, the Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, FEMA— the list goes on and on. It is quite staggering. In some cases these bureaucrats are getting billions, in some cases only millions, and in almost all cases there will be oversight entities the creation and management of which will be in the millions.

I am still in shock looking at this thing, and trust me it is a THING. But I have managed to identify a few of the highlights for me, and here they are:

Housing and Urban Development: 5 billion, Fed Transportation Administration: 6 billion, Highway Infrastructure: 30 billion, Higher Education Act: 16 billion, Education for Disadvantaged: 13 billion, Rural Development: 5 billion, Employment Training: 4 billion. And remember that these amounts do not include millions of dollars for the oversight entities ( money for salaries and in some cases building actual facilities) required for each disbursement of “stimulus.”

A couple of other memorable stimuli are 44 million for some agricultural buildings that we need somewhere (and 245 million in salaries to go with the buildings,) 300 million for job corps centers, operating expenses for the Corporation for National and Community Service, 300 million for the National Mall, etc. etc.

A few interesting tidbits I gleaned from the bill are:

There is a Broadband initiative (covered I believe under Rural Development) which seeks to insure that every household in the US can have internet access other than dialup. I heard discussion of this on CSPAN where a Representative from Texas complained that the way it has been set up in the bill, local Broadband contractors will not be eligible to do the work — so much for local job creation.

The government wants to build a new national computer center.

This bill contains a provision to limit the “administrative expenses” of the Social Security Administration.

AND I learned some new jargon so that I can hold my head high and be informed as I journey further into the 21st century:

Telemedicine is the use of telecommunication technologies to deliver medical information and services to locations at a distance from the care giver or educator.

US Green Building Rating System is The United States Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design green building rating standard referred to as the LEED Green Building Rating System.

Spare me.

This only the tip of the iceberg. You can do your civic duty and read the entire bill here http://readthestimulus.org/ but don’t say I didn’t warn you. ( The website is sponsored by The Heritage Foundation, Kithridge, NTU, CAGW, Freedom Works, CFG, Redstate, Taxpayers for Commonsense, Americans for Prosperity, TCOT, and Lighthouse Strategies and Consulting)

Grassley votes NO on Geithner as Treasury Secretary

In a great article, Michelle Malkin writes about the vote to confirm Tim Geithner as Treasury Secretary. I was pleased to read that Iowa’s Senator Grassley was a NO vote. Malkin has labeled those Republicans who voted ‘yes’ as “B.O. Republicans- Barack Obama/Bend Over Republicans.”

And here are the GOP Senators who will be able to point back proudly to their votes when the B.O. Republicans start panicking in the wake of more Geithner-engineered failures:

The five senators who voted “no” are all Republicans: Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, Jon Kyl of Arizona, Jim Bunning of Kentucky, Pat Roberts of Kansas and Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming.

Thanks Mr. Grassley for your NO vote. I hope that your vote signals you will not be a “B.O. Republican”! We need your grit and strong backbone to stand up for Conservatives beliefs and for what is right and honorable.

While the article was an interesting read, the comment section was worthy of my time, as well. I will share one comment here but do suggest you check them out.

“So now we have a head of the IRS who can’t do his own taxes. I suddenly feel all hopey and changey….”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers