Senate’s Turn to Deal with the Pork

This is the week the stimulus bill heads to the United States Senate.  While the goal of this bill is to stimulate the economy in hopes of creating more jobs and helping out hardworking middle America, it is engorged with massive spending on provisions that have nothing to do with helping the economy.

Provisions of the bill that many legislators are questioning:

$1 billion for Amtrak, which hasn’t earned a profit in four decades.

$2 billion to help subsidize child care.

$400 million for research into global warming.

$2.4 billion for projects to demonstrate how carbon greenhouse gas can be safely removed from the atmosphere.

$650 million for coupons to help consumers convert their TV sets from analog to digital, part of the digital TV conversion.

$600 million to buy a new fleet of cars for federal employees and government departments.

$75 million to fund programs to help people quit smoking.

$21 million to re-sod the National Mall, which suffered heavy use during the Inauguration.

$2.25 billion for national parks. This item has sparked calls for an investigation, because the chief lobbyist of the National Parks Association is the son of Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wisc. The $2,25 billion is about equal to the National Park Service’s entire annual budget. The Washington Times reports it is a threefold increase over what was originally proposed for parks in the stimulus bill. Obey is chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

$335 million for treatment and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases.

$50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts. $4.19 billion to stave off foreclosures via the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. The bill allows nonprofits to compete with cities and states for $3.44 billion of the money, which means a substantial amount of it will be captured by ACORN, the controversial activist group currently under federal investigation for vote fraud. Another $750 million would be exclusively reserved for nonprofits such as ACORN – meaning cities and states are barred from receiving that money. Sen. David Vitter, R-La., charges the money could appear to be a “payoff” for the partisan political activities community groups in the last election cycle.

$44 million to renovate the headquarters building of the Agriculture Department.

$32 billion for a “smart electricity grid to minimize waste.

$87 billion of Medicaid funds, to aid states.

$53.4 billion for science facilities, high speed Internet, and miscellaneous energy and environmental programs.

$13 billion to repair and weatherize public housing, help the homeless, repair foreclosed homes.

$20 billion for quicker depreciation and write-offs for equipment.

$10.3 billion for tax credits to help families defray the cost of college tuition.

$20 billion over five years for an expanded food stamp program.

The one little victory in this bill is that the $200 million allocated to Planned Parenthood for abortions in order to stimulate the economy was cut.  Could it be that Democrats are realizing that reducing the workforce will actually contribute to the economic downturn?  I’m not that stupid to believe that.  President Obama threw Planned Parenthood under the bus in order to pass this bill with bipartisan support, which didn’t happen since no House Republican voted for it and neither did eleven Democrats.

I wish that  Republican governors would stand this firm against the stimulus package, but some prominent names are in line with their hands out in order to receive their piece of the pie.  I understand that governors are supposed to make decisions that are in the best interest of their states and they have to balance their budgets, but is sacrificing conservative principles and putting the nation into over a trillion dollars of debt worth it?  Pushing to pass a pork engorged bill all in the name of getting your share is one of the reasons people are not voting for us.

The bill is now in the hands of the Senate where Republicans are demanding a cut in the irresponsible spending and offering solutions that will help main street.  However, Obama is doing everything he can to put pressure on them to pass the stimulus.  I thought we were done with these ads on November 4th.

Mulkin on McConnell and Big Government

I have become a fan of Michelle Malkin. When one of her articles shows up on Twitter, I check out what she has to say. I share her article here, hoping you will check it out. This writing takes on Mitch McConnell and Big Government.

For one thing, Michelle has great terms for the “Stimulus” Package: Generational Theft Act, Crap Sandwich Supreme, Porkulus, Spendulus, Debt Stimulus Plan.

All morning I have listened to FOX News and the various pundits and others who have come on to give their views on the Stimulus Package. Seems everyone has an opinion.

What bothers me is that Republican Governors seem to be on the hunt for money for THEIR state and see the Obama Plan as their ticket out of debt. And, as shared on FOX, it will only take “sweetening” the package for a few Senators in order to get their yes vote in order to pass this horrible bill.

I find this disgusting. The trouble is, many of us find the Porkulus Bill disgusting but we aren’t the ones getting to vote. Money talks, money grows on trees, and money seems to be the impossible thing to turn down. I was hoping that Republicans would stand firm. Be united. Say NO. But, “hoping” perhaps only works for those who supported Obama.

Yet, I do hope that Republicans can deny their hunt for easy money and keep hammering away on other options that will help Americans, not continue to inflict more debt. We do not need a steady diet of “Crap Sandwich Supreme”!

Daschle: another great reason for the Fair Tax

Tom Daschle’s tax problem
Tom Daschle, President Obama’s nominee for health and human services secretary, apologized on Monday for errors on his tax returns-including failing to pay taxes on the use of a limousine and driver-that resulted in $146,000 in back payments. “I am deeply embarrassed,” Daschle wrote in a letter to leaders of the Senate Finance Committee.

So, Tom Daschle is “deeply embarrassed” that he did not pay his taxes.

Callmecrusader is angry. How many of these self-important people get to parade in front of committees in order to apologize for ‘tax problems’ and then be rewarded with a job? Where is the anger from Americans who DO pay their taxes?

Yes, we all make mistakes but I am starting to wonder if it is the norm for Daschle types to not pay taxes because they know a little squirming in the hot seat will get them back in  good graces of their peers and the American public has no power to be the ones to say NO!

The Fair Tax seems to be FAIRER all the time! If our current tax system is so complicated that wealthy Government employees can’t get their taxes paid correctly then it seems to be past time to make big changes in our tax laws.

The average American needs to care about this issue. The timing is right to fervently promote the Fair Tax. I am sick of the apologies from people who can afford lawyers to get them out of their “tax problems.” And, yes, I am embarrassed that President Obama continues to send up these kinds of candidates for high profile government positions. Just because someone can afford a limousine AND a driver does not make them qualified for a job. Surely there are other capable Americans who DO follow the rules. It’s time to find them.

If I had the opportunity to vote for Daschle it would be a simple vote: NO!

Another Boneheaded Plan from the State of Iowa

Just what is it with the Iowa government lately? First they want to lease the lottery, now they want to send your new drivers license through the mail.  According to an article in today’s Des Moines Register the Iowa Department of Transportation, in an effort to curb identity theft, will no longer issue your drivers license from the drivers license stations located across the state. Instead when you renew you license will be the recipient of simple piece of paper that will substitute for your license until you receive it in the mail approximately 11 days later. According to IDMV director Shirley Andres this move is an attempt to prevent the licensing procedure from lending itself to identity theft.

The Iowa Department of Motor Vehicles is asserting that sending drivers licenses through the mail is more secure than the current system. I would disagree with their assumptions. There is no way to make distance commerce such as this more secure than face to face commerce. There are just to many factors in using the mail to conduct this business that are just out of our control. One of the most important in regards to identity theft is that using the mail system forces an important identification document to be handled by numerous individuals. Then of course there is also the possibility that it could get lost in the mail. I know the mail system in Iowa, all too often I have had pieces of mail get lost in the system never to resurface.

If you can’t tell, I am opposed to this plan, it isn’t because I just want to be difficult. It is because I have some very legitimate concerns about the plan that they are attempting to implement. If you have some concerns as well, contact your local elected official to voice your opinion.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 694 other followers