New Names for our Wall of Pride

In case you haven’t noticed, we have a new addition to IDA.  We have had the Wall of Shame for quit some time now for those politicians who decide to disappoint or fool the Iowa voters.  We have now added the Conservative Wall of Pride which will showcase those in our party who stand by the principles of the Republican party and go the extra mile for their Iowa constituents.

The two names I would like to add to the Wall of Pride today is Rep. Kent Sorenson and Rep. Chris Hagenow.  These two fine conservatives took overnight shifts at the statehouse to keep a watchful eye on the shenanigans of Speaker Murphy and his party while waiting for the voting machine to close on the 50-46 prevailing wage failure.  Both of these men gave Twitter updates throughout the night and I would like to share with you the best update given by each of them:

Kent Sorenson……

At 4am Murphy left and a group from the ISU Republicans came to visit.

Chris Hagenow……

Rep. Zirklebach is at the rostrum spitting chew into a styrofoam cup.

Gov. Schwarzenegger and what’s best for the country

California’s governor, who just signed a bill to raise taxes by $12 billion to help close a $42 billion budget gap, said politicians need to go beyond their principles and think about what’s best for the country.

It seems to me that Governor Schwarzenegger would have enough to do in order to hold California together that he would not have the need to throw stones at other Americans. His statement about getting beyond “principles” and thinking what is “best for the country” is disguising. Yet, I am not surprised. Coming from a governor of a state that has spent its way into the poor farm, I guess it is a hope that the rest of the U.S. will want to sacrifice principles and personally earned income to help bail out all those who were and are of the spend what we don’t have philosophy.

Rarely do I read comments left by readers but in the case of this article, I did. Somewhere out there are two people who are my kindred political spirits and I share their wisdom below.

Gov. Schwarzenegger asked the right question — “What is right for the country now”, but his answer is not quite right. The Spendulus money for California only prolong the disease of over spending, not curing it. This crisis is a good opportunity to shrink state government spending, and we are not doing it.

What a shock. A rhino who thinks principles are not important. Situational morality… what is right or wrong changes constantly depending on who or what you are trying to fix at the moment. That is called politics as usual and that is what got us into this crisis.

The country’s in the middle of a crisis and President Obama needs team players. (Schwarzenegger)

How about it, Americans, are you  going follow Arnold’s lead to sign up for Obama’s team? I opt to keep my “principles” no matter what a California governor says!

The Punishment of Success

The contradictions between what President Barack Obama says and what he does are immense. In an article this morning published by the Washington Post he has vowed to cut the United States budget deficit within four years. This will most assuredly be a difficult task as the current budget has become even more bloated thanks to Porkfest 2009, the recent $700 BILLION stimulus package pushed through Congress by the Obama administration.  Of course the White House has stated a couple of methods for achieving their stated goals.

One such method that the Obama administration plans to utilize in order to reduce the deficit is a reduction in spending on the Iraq War. I understand that the war will end eventually, but I think that it would be a disaster to end it prematurely. Until stability has been achieved we cannot completely withdraw troops from the nation. I truly hope that Obama can see that an earlier withdrawal from that nation can and will lead to a destabilization of the region and leave the region open to exploitation by terrorist organizations and rogue nations. A premature withdrawal of US military forces from Iraq could result in the need for a reinvasion of the nation to capture or eliminate terrorist threats in the future.

Another method that Obama intends to use to help shrink the budget deficit is to raise taxes on what he calls wealthy families. These are families earning at least $250,000 a year. He doesn’t seem to take into account that families that earn in the neighborhood of $250,000 tend to be self-employed small business owners. Because of this they do not have the advantage of employer provided benefits. As a result much of what the rest of us take for granted such as health insurance and holiday pay these “wealthy” families do not receive. For these families any unexpected operating expense for their business usually comes from the family budget. These families have poured their hearts and souls into building a successful small business. Now President Obama comes along and wants to punish these highly motivated and hard working families with higher taxes. Tell me where is the justice in that? Why should the hardworking business owners subsidize someone else’s poor judgment? Why should business owners subsidize a single mother because she doesn’t have the common sense to use protection?

President Obama has plans for the US, but they will not advance our nation. Instead Obama’s plans for our nation will put our nation at risk. They will put the middle class at risk. Obama’s plan will do more to curb ambition and aspirations for a better life. In short President Obama rather than using good sense and rewarding the most hardworking and industrious among us will punish them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 688 other followers