Sebelius + “Tiller the Killer”: an appalling Obama nomination

Jan Mickelson had a great program today on Obama’s nomination of Kathleen Sebelius for Secretary of Health and Human Services. Mickelson said that “every pro-life group on the planet went haywire” at the news of this nomination. Mickelson also added that Sebelius is an “appalling nomination.”

News outlets have been discussing Obama nominating the Kansas Governor and wondering if this nomination is a “slap in the face” for pro-life supporters. I say, yes, it is! We should not be surprised with all that Obama said as he campaigned about supporting Planned Parenthood and the right for women to have a choice. And, we should not be surprised about this nomination given what Obama has done to promote abortions world wide since becoming President.

If you would like to know more about Kathleen Sebelius and why pro-life Americans are so adamant that she not be confirmed to be Secretary of Health and Human Services please check out this Christian Post article.

http://www.christianpost.com/Society/Politics/2009/03/pro-life-groups-pledge-to-oppose-gov-sebelius-as-health-chief-02/page2.html

Also, pay attention to the term “Tiller the Killer.” Tiller is described as “America’s most notorious abortionist” and he has close ties to Sebelius.

http://www.lifenews.com/nat4845.html

Spector, Collins, and Snowe receive fitting award

A much deserved award goes to Specter, Collins, and Snowe AND they won it in “a landslide.” So glad to see the turncoats get this kind of deserved recognition. Thanks Club for Growth.

February’s ‘Comrade of the Month’ Is….
Washington – The Club for Growth’s Comrade of the Month Award for February goes to-drum roll please-Senators Arlen Specter (R-PA), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Olympia Snowe (R-ME).
Eighty-six percent of Club for Growth members chose to award the three “moderate” Republican senators the Comrade of the Month Award for their support of President Obama’s $800 billion stimulus bill. While every other Republican member of Congress-and even some Democrats-had the courage to vote against the bill because of its steep price tag and piles of waste, Senators Specter, Collins, and Snowe joined with the Democrats in the Senate to jam the monstrosity down the throats of American taxpayers.
“As future generations of American taxpayers struggle to pay off the country’s mountain of debt, they will have these three Republican Senators to thank,” said Club for Growth Executive Director David Keating. “While Senators Specter, Collins, and Snowe tout the stimulus bill as a compromise, it was more of a capitulation to the Democrats than anything else. Had these three senators voted with the rest of their party, President Obama would have been forced to engage the Republicans in a genuine compromise. Instead, American taxpayers are saddled with an $800 billion bill that will do little to stimulate the economy.”
The Club for Growth’s Comrade of the Month award is awarded at the end every month to the public official or figure who best lives up to the policies of big government and favors restrictions on economic freedom.

John Boehner and Republicans speak out

Often I wonder what the Republicans are doing to try to stop the never-ending want for more money that President Obama and the Democrats seem to think will come forever from American taxpayers. Today I got an answer to my inquiring mind. John Boehner and other House Republican leaders are making statements and asking questions. I say keep on rattling the cages of the big spenders who continue to ignore taxpayers who shout STOP!!!!

Boehner says “American people are looking…for real leadership.”

We are not only looking for real leadership- we are demanding it. It may be 2010 before our anger about being taxed to death will be truly known, but in the mean time Iowa Defense Alliance is committed to keep taxpayers/voters up to date on what our elected officials are saying and doing, and in some cases not doing.

http://republican-news-sweep.blogspot.com/2009/02/house-republicans-press-treasury.html

House Republicans Press Treasury Secretary Geithner for TARP “Exit Strategy”
House Republican leaders today wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, inquiring about the Obama Administration’s “exit strategy” from the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). The letter comes as Geithner and other Administration officials are determining how to use the second $350 billion installment of TARP funds President Obama requested last month and whether to request additional taxpayer funds beyond the initial $700 billion authorized last year.

“Because the Administration has committed itself to assisting the auto industry, satisfying commitments made by the previous Administration, and devoting up to $100 billion to mitigate mortgage foreclosures, it has been reported that President Obama might need more than the $700 billion authorized by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (‘EESA’) to fund a ‘bad bank’ to absorb hard-to-value toxic assets,” wrote the leaders. “In light of these commitments – which come at a time when the Federal Reserve is flooding the financial system with trillions of dollars and the Congress is finalizing a fiscal stimulus that is expected to cost taxpayers more than $1.1 trillion – it is not surprising that the American people are asking where it all ends, and whether anyone in Washington is looking out for their wallets.”

Specifically, the leaders asked Secretary Geithner to provide answers to six questions before the Administration determines the next steps for the TARP program, including:

1. How does the Administration plan to maximize taxpayer value and guarantee the most effective distribution of the remaining $350 billion of TARP funds?

2. How is the Administration lending, assessing risk, selecting institutions for assistance, and determining expectations for repayment?

3. Will the Administration opt for a complex “bad bank” rescue plan? How can the “bad bank” efficiently price assets and minimize taxpayer risk? Will financial institutions be required to give substantial ownership stakes to the Federal government to participate in the program?

4. Is a “bad bank” plan an intermediate step that leads to nationalizing America’s banks?

5. Can you elaborate on your plans for the use of an insurance program for toxic assets? Specifically, will you seek to price insurance programs to ensure that taxpayer interests are protected? If so, how will you do so?

6. What is the exit strategy for the government’s sweeping involvement in the financial markets?

“Indeed, a bipartisan majority of the House – 171 Republicans and 99 Democrats – recently expressed the same concerns, voting to disapprove releasing the final $350 billion from the TARP,” the leaders concluded. “As we noted in our December 2, 2008 letter to then-Secretary Paulson and Chairman Bernanke, we realize that changing conditions require agility in developing responses. However, the seemingly ad hoc implementation of TARP has led many to wonder if uncertainty is being added to markets at precisely the time when they are desperately seeking a sense of direction.”

http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=113066

Washington, Mar 3 – House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) today released the following statement as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag testify this morning before the House Ways & Means and Budget Committees:

“American families and small businesses know we cannot afford more taxes, more spending, and more debt amid this increasingly-severe recession, and they deserve real answers from Secretary Geithner and Director Orszag today.  How can the Administration justify a trillion-dollar tax hike on families, seniors, and small businesses during a recession?  With our nation’s economy in a tailspin, who will pay for the big government spending spree proposed in the Administration’s budget?  During this unprecedented economic turmoil, why does the President plan to sign into law the nearly half-trillion spending bill making its way through Congress, even though it is loaded with some 9,000 airdropped earmarks and includes the biggest discretionary spending increase since the Carter Administration?

“With a deepening recession and growing uncertainty among middle-class families about their jobs and nest eggs, the American people are looking to both parties in Washington for real leadership during times of economic crisis.  That is precisely why we should be working together on a responsible budget that helps our economy recover without piling more debt on future generations.”

Americans: “Rebellion can be contagious”

I am reading Miracle at Philadelphia, the Story of the Constitutional Convention May to September 1787 by Catherine Drinker Bowen. In honor of those working to take a stand, to protest, what is happening in 2009, I share one paragraph from the book.

“…Since ’86, Massachusetts had suffered public humiliation over Shay’s Rebellion in the west. Desperate farmers, ruinously taxed – “by Boston,” they said- and seeing their cattle and their land distrained by the bailiffs, had risen in revolt. With staves and pitchforks they had marched on county courthouses after the best Revolutionary technique, frightening sound-money men out of their wits and rousing General Washington to express disgust and anger that a country which had won a difficult war was not able to keep order in peacetime. By January, 1787, fourteen rioting leaders, earlier condemned to death, had been pardoned; a newly elected Massachusetts legislature would enact many of the reforms the Shaysites had demanded. Yet the stigma of insurrection remained, and the Federal Convention sat men who had themselves suffered at the hands of the mobs: James Wilson, Robert Morris and John Dickinson knew well that rebellion can be contagious.”

“…rebellion can be contagious.”

We are not all farmers with “staves and pitchforks” yet I hope as I share this piece of American History, readers of my post will be renewed in their effort to know that a rebellion 222 years ago made a difference. If the America that was designed by “the miracle of our Constitution” years ago is worth preserving we must rebel now.

Stand up, Americans. Find YOUR way to make your voice heard.

Rebellions can be contagious.

From Michelle Malkin:

Now is the time for all good taxpayers to turn the tables on free-lunching countrymen and their enablers in Washington. Community organizing helped propel Barack Obama to the White House. It can work for fiscal conservatism, too.

From PAJAMASTV:

revolution. In a new American Tea Party, citizens across the USA are beginning to protest giant government programs that reach deep into their pockets. These programs create huge economic burdens on American families and threaten their livelihood now and into the future.

The Pajamas TV team including Michelle Malkin, Glenn Reynolds, and Joe Wurzelbacher (aka Joe the Plumber) – are mobilized to help cover this new and evolving revolution.

Nancy Pelosi’s List

So Nancy Pelosi has a bad list- a “disfavor file” and on the list sited in the Politico article are eight people/groups, among them Rush Limbaugh and Eric Cantor- (R).

Nothing would surprise me about Nancy Pelosi. I doubt it surprises any of those on “the list” that they are among those who have “screwed up… to merely annoying her.”

This article is one more red flag to Americans as to the character of those we have placed in power. We have someone in such a high position that is vindictive, mean, and calloused. Pelosi has been in Washington, D.C. too long.

It is time that Pelosi is on a list. Let’s see, I think I will call it the Vote Pelosi Out list. Or maybe, No More Pelosi list. It is time for her to go before she assists in decisions to kill even more unborn babies and does more harm to America. We can only hope that the voters who actually do get to vote Pelosi OUT will have a “propensity for remembering…”

Pelosi’s list: Who’s on her bad side?
Those around Pelosi say she has always kept her own favor file. But, like her father, she has also maintained a “disfavor file” in her head – a roster of those whom she believes have screwed up, betrayed her, challenged her or merely annoyed her.

…and she has a propensity for remembering slights and grievances for years.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 688 other followers