Guest Commentary – At What Point by Tom Shaw

During my twenty years of service in the U.S. Navy I lived in and visited many foreign nations.  I was stationed in the Philippines during the “People’s Power” revolution and participated in a historic port visit to Shanghai, China in May, 1989, during which the Chinese took to the streets to protest the communist regime (remember Tieniman Square?).  In both cases, I always wondered, at what point did the people risk their lives to stand up against their tyrannical government.  More specifically, at what point did the military and police decide to side with the people and rebel against the government.

Searching for an answer to this question is not just an academic exercise for me.  Although I am retired from active duty, I am still obligated in my oath to support and defend the Constitution.  In my current capacity as a Police Chief, I am sworn to uphold the law.  So, at what point would I, and all others in my position, determine that the assault on our Constitution is so severe it would warrant us from disobeying laws and regulations that are clearly in violation of the powers granted by the United States Constitution?

The principles upon which our Nation was founded have been slowly eroding over time.   Due in part to changing social values and a diffusion of personal responsibility, the words and philosophies of our Founding Fathers do not ring true to many of today’s citizens.   Apathy, which has replaced the natural fear of government, and the ever increasing reliance upon government institutions have created a ripe environment for the growth of abusive power by our elected officials.  The power of “We the People” has slowly been ceded to elected officials, which in turn, emboldens them to slowly usurp the Constitutional principles and move towards a socialist approach.

Smugness and arrogance seem to rule the political scene today.  Just look at how the Tea Party protesters, who merely exercised their right to assemble and redress their grievances, were ridiculed.  Recently, the Department of Homeland Security released an intelligence assessment which demonized veterans as potential domestic terrorists.   The huge amount of federal borrowing in the effort to create an economic stimulus has just enslaved our grandchildren to the government.  The Iowa Supreme Court recently created a “right”, where none such existed, when it proclaimed Iowa’s law limiting marriage to one man and one woman unconstitutional.

Although it is not recognized by most, tyranny, in the form of increasing government intrusion into the citizen’s private lives eerily marches on.  One day we will wake up and say, “Where have our freedoms gone?”  Freedom lost will not be regained.  So again, at what point during the slow transformation from a republic to a socialist state we will say, “Enough is enough.”    Abraham Lincoln had the following to say during his First Inaugural Address, March 4th 1861, “This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it.  Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their “constitutional” right of amending it or their “revolutionary” right to dismember or overthrow it.”

It is my greatest desire that I should never have to face the decision that our forefather’s had to make.  One cannot comprehend the gut-wrenching choice that was laid before them when they had finally reached “their point.”    What courage and bravery they showed when they risked life and property to stand against tyranny.  With the growing fear and distrust of government at all levels, will there be an incident which sparks a nationwide rebellion?  If so, at what point do the military and police side with “We the People” and determine that defending the Constitution overrides protecting the sitting government?  I pray that America continues to use the peaceful political process to work out its differences and that I may never have to determine “At What Point.”

Tom Shaw is an independent candidate for Iowa House District 8.

Advertisement

About Al Bregar
I am a founding member of the Iowa Defense Alliance and have been politically active since the summer of 2007. I am currently a full time student working toward a Bachelor's Degree in Information Technology. I would love to get our state back on track so that I can stay in Iowa once I have earned my degree.

6 Responses to Guest Commentary – At What Point by Tom Shaw

  1. Great — the police chief of Laurens threatens to be close to siding with those who would rebel against the tyranny of our government–while he draws his navy pension. Threatening to side with those with guns, “military and police,” to override the sitting government is so patriotic. This is mindless crap and encourages the nuts.

  2. Al Bregar says:

    Mr. Van Antwerpen,

    Would you consider our countries founding fathers nuts. They faced this very dilemma at the birth of our nation. They had to decide whether they were going to side with an oppressive government or to rise up in opposition to earn their freedom.

    So which side would you rather have Mr. Shaw fall on. A government that has become more oppressive, or the people who desire freedom?

  3. midnightq says:

    I desire freedom and liberty. I too hope for a peaceful process to restore our liberties. I have been wondering which point do we have to fight or should we fight?

    Excellent thoughts and well written to express our concern although people with the opposing worldview may never understand it, I hope and pray that they will someday.

    I am thankful for our freedom of speech no matter how ridiculed to express these concerns.

  4. Using guns to rebel or overthrow our elected government is not the same as revolting against a dictator (King George). If our police chief does not like the laws–he should run for office (which he is doing—you go guy!) or vote for politicians he agrees with. Our chief does a great job enforcing our laws–he should not use rhetoric that toys with the idea of revolt or violence. When the lawless start shooting we will lose our freedom and liberty—to the very nuts who say they are protecting them.

  5. taco says:

    Abraham Lincoln was also the same president that suspended habeas corpus.

    Trampling the Constitution is nothing new. John Adams even did so with the Alien and Sedition Act and John Adams was a respectable man. Thank goodness men like Thomas Jefferson were elected to right that wrong. But my my, we have gone WAY too long without someone like Jefferson to right the wrongs.

  6. KRidge says:

    The question should be rephrased as “at what point does the military and police decide to overthrow the democratically elected representatives of ‘We the People’ under the pretext of defending the Constitution?”

    Dictatorships around the world have used the same argument to seize power for centuries.

    The decision of our Funding Fathers to overthrow English rule because they had no representation (we were a colony) is a very different matter than overthrowing a government we elected (did you forget that part?)

    And how many Tea Party protestors were beaten, jailed, or killed? None. But their rights were violated because someone made fun of them? This is now a violation of their First Amendment rights?

    This is nonsense rhetoric disguised as Constitutional theory.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 688 other followers