So Much For Inevitibility
January 29, 2010 15 Comments
In the wake of the off year caucus it would not be unreasonable to assume that all of the Republican Party’s declared candidates would have garnered the required number of signatures. However, that does not seem to be the case. On two consecutive days this week I have received emails from two prominent campaigns asking for help in acquiring the signatures needed. This indicates to me that these campaigns have failed to garner the required signatures. Now I admit that they could simply be trying to gather more signatures than is needed, however I couldn’t see them going through the added expense of generating an email to do this.
The first candidate that I spoke of is 3rd Congressional candidate Jim Gibbons. In the email that the Gibbons camp sent out it specifically mentions an increased number of caucus goers this year over previous off year caucuses. I find this comment especially interesting considering Gibbons appears to not have garnered enough signatures at the caucuses to get his name on the June primary ballot. In fact the headline of the email sent out is “Next Step: Get Jim on the Ballot.” This clearly points to a feeling among the party base that Gibbons is not their guy.
The second candidate that appears to have failed at getting nominating signatures has been promoted as the inevitable gubernatorial nominee. In an email sent out by the Branstad campaign they are soliciting their supporters to get out and promote him. However the tool that they are using to do this is the nominating paperwork. It would seem that Terry Branstad has failed to garner the required number of signatures at the various caucuses around the state. Another thing that I find interesting about the Branstad campaigns effort is that they felt the need to “bribe” people into getting the papers signed. This would indicate to me that not only is the prospect of another Branstad administration not appealing to the base of the party, but his supporters are not all that thrilled to go out to do the dirty work to get their guy nominated. It is clear that contrary to what Branstad’s supporters want you to believe, his ascension to Governor is anything but a foregone conclusion.
There is little doubt in my mind that both of these candidates will manage to acquire the required number of signatures to file with the Iowa Secretary of State. However what is in doubt is how they would fare against their competitors. Both of these gentlemen should have been able to gather their required signatures last Saturday, but they failed at that endeavor. So much for inevitability.

Dave Funk on President Obama’s State of the Union Address
January 28, 2010 by Al Bregar 1 Comment
The following is a press release released by 3rd Congressional District Candidate Dave Funk
Dave Funk, Candidate for Congress; Iowa-03 Responds to SOTU and Unsuccessful Job Creation of 2009
Job creation is the biggest myth in the economy right now. That is, those jobs “created” by the government. Job creation, when done as direct investment by the government in the government, is no more than a long term unfunded mandate on the local level. Here’s why:
Last night President Obama said, “Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. 200,000 work in construction and clean energy. 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, and first responders. And we are on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.”
That’s right, jobs created in law enforcement, education and construction (roads & infrastructure). These are government related jobs! Gov. Chet Culver as well has been following the same logic as Leonard Boswell in Iowa and President Obama.
How will the schools pay for these new jobs when their budgets are being cut? How does the police force justify their budgets when the number of officers increased and crime did not? What will construction workers do when their projects are done? All they have done is place financial liabilities that cannot be avoided on state and local governments. There is no way around this burden and now either the greater population suffers because the state and local governments have to find the money to cover it or our state’s lose even more power and are dependent on the welfare of the federal government.
When the government makes a direct investment in jobs that add no economic productivity to the underlying economy it is impossible to turn a job created into more jobs created. When you make a financial investment, your intent is for your money to make you more money. This is the same logic. When the government stimulates job growth it should be creating jobs that will help create more jobs indefinitely.
In Iowa, the government has spent $1.5 billion on 5,336 jobs. These jobs were also in education, law enforcement and infrastructure. The state of Iowa already has had to make a 10% budget cut across the board. Now they’ll either have to find ways of supporting this increase they’ve accrued in annual costs or they will have to cut pay or layoff more to make up for it. And here’s the saddest thing of it all. Even if the state of Iowa or any area were to just lay off the people they hired from the stimulus package they are still stuck paying unemployment benefits. There is no way around this cost burden – this unfunded mandate from the Federal government.
We need to get away from creating jobs for the sake of creating jobs and start pushing private investment in the private sector. This could have been funds managed by private equity and venture capital to grow businesses in high growth industries. It could have been done through private investment tax incentives or simply doing away with capital gains taxes. There were so many ways the government could have created more jobs with that money and they have now borrowed from our children’s and grandchildren’s futures for unsustainable jobs.
The government needs to follow one rule of thumb: The government should NEVER invest money in itself for the sole purpose of growth and job creation. It’s like creating 1,000,000 widgets for a market of 500 people. It’s too much! We cannot let them be stupid with our money anymore. Time to stop the Stupid Spending! Vote these people out!
www.CongressNeedsFunk.com
Filed under Guest Commentary, Politics Tagged with 3rd Congressional District, Dave Funk, President Barack Obama, State of the Union Address