<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Much For Inevitibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/</link>
	<description>An alliance of Iowans determined to defend traditional Iowa values.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Bregar</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Bregar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are multiple reasons for my lack of comment on the subject. I have not had as much time to blog as my frequency can attest to because of my academic endeavors. Additionally I have not been able to follow the story as much as I would like to. However if you would like to have my comments on it, I will do a little research to develop a position on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are multiple reasons for my lack of comment on the subject. I have not had as much time to blog as my frequency can attest to because of my academic endeavors. Additionally I have not been able to follow the story as much as I would like to. However if you would like to have my comments on it, I will do a little research to develop a position on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look what I found:

&quot;Jim Knapp, a Sacramento based Tea Party activist, went even further, telling TPMmuckraker via email: &quot;Most of the anger by Tea Party supporters is directed at the effects of special interest money.&quot;

Knapp continued:
I believe that campaign finance reform is the most important political issue facing America. I would even go so far as to say that this issue is even more important that our current financial crisis and jobs. Everything in American politics is affected by special interest money. From who controls our monetary policies in treasury and the Fed to regulation of Wall Street. I would also venture to say that it was special interest money which precipitated the current economic crisis.&quot;

Let&#039;s talk about this.  Everyone else is commenting on it--why not this blog?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look what I found:</p>
<p>&#8220;Jim Knapp, a Sacramento based Tea Party activist, went even further, telling TPMmuckraker via email: &#8220;Most of the anger by Tea Party supporters is directed at the effects of special interest money.&#8221;</p>
<p>Knapp continued:<br />
I believe that campaign finance reform is the most important political issue facing America. I would even go so far as to say that this issue is even more important that our current financial crisis and jobs. Everything in American politics is affected by special interest money. From who controls our monetary policies in treasury and the Fed to regulation of Wall Street. I would also venture to say that it was special interest money which precipitated the current economic crisis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s talk about this.  Everyone else is commenting on it&#8211;why not this blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iowanforabetteriowa</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iowanforabetteriowa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIP Branstad keep your memories and past buried we had you once, but i sure don&#039;t want you now for Iowa&#039;s future. Iowa needs new ideas not recycled 1980s ideas that are so out of touch with society as we know it now. Please keep TB out in the pasture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP Branstad keep your memories and past buried we had you once, but i sure don&#8217;t want you now for Iowa&#8217;s future. Iowa needs new ideas not recycled 1980s ideas that are so out of touch with society as we know it now. Please keep TB out in the pasture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowans Rock</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iowans Rock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, you might want to sign Branstad&#039;s nomination petition yourself (I heard he needs signatures) because then you would see that there is nowhere on there that an email address is required.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, you might want to sign Branstad&#8217;s nomination petition yourself (I heard he needs signatures) because then you would see that there is nowhere on there that an email address is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowans Rock</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iowans Rock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 03:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope.   Bob VP&#039;s campaign has done nothing new to reach out to new voters except for that small little detail that he was endorsed by the leader of the Iowa/Nebraska NAACP who is now his campaign co-chair.  Please look up the last time someone from the NAACP endorsed a Republican.  Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.   Bob VP&#8217;s campaign has done nothing new to reach out to new voters except for that small little detail that he was endorsed by the leader of the Iowa/Nebraska NAACP who is now his campaign co-chair.  Please look up the last time someone from the NAACP endorsed a Republican.  Wait for it, wait for it, wait for it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Bregar</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Bregar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alicia, 
I am afraid that you have it wrong. They don&#039;t ask for signatures on the nominating petition unless they actually need them. So please don&#039;t try to turn this into an indictment of any other campaign. And the lack of signatures at the caucuses was a huge rebuke. It demonstrates that Branstad does not have the support of the party base..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alicia,<br />
I am afraid that you have it wrong. They don&#8217;t ask for signatures on the nominating petition unless they actually need them. So please don&#8217;t try to turn this into an indictment of any other campaign. And the lack of signatures at the caucuses was a huge rebuke. It demonstrates that Branstad does not have the support of the party base..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alicia</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alicia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey guess what guys, this is what campaigns do to solicit more email addresses, more supporters, more volunteers.  Check with any major campaign like Huckabee, Obama, etc.  

I would wager this is NOT because they don&#039;t have the signatures, rather, it&#039;s a way to get more people involved in their campaign.  Which Vander Plaats has done nothing to reach out to NEW people. 

And PS danny boy, it&#039;s a little contradictory to say it&#039;s a rebuke but you think he&#039;ll get the signatures anyway.  That whole post makes no sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guess what guys, this is what campaigns do to solicit more email addresses, more supporters, more volunteers.  Check with any major campaign like Huckabee, Obama, etc.  </p>
<p>I would wager this is NOT because they don&#8217;t have the signatures, rather, it&#8217;s a way to get more people involved in their campaign.  Which Vander Plaats has done nothing to reach out to NEW people. </p>
<p>And PS danny boy, it&#8217;s a little contradictory to say it&#8217;s a rebuke but you think he&#8217;ll get the signatures anyway.  That whole post makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you see Branstad&#039;s campaign is now &quot;rewarding&quot; his supporters now with &quot;prizes&quot; for getting his name on the ballot?  They must be desperate now. Good grief!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see Branstad&#8217;s campaign is now &#8220;rewarding&#8221; his supporters now with &#8220;prizes&#8221; for getting his name on the ballot?  They must be desperate now. Good grief!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyBoy</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyBoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just so you know, I was also at that Polk County caucus.  It was a flat-out rebuke.  People were laughing at TB&#039;s blank sheet.  Yes, we realize all of these candidates will get the signatures needed but the coronated winner of the GOP primary should not have blank sheets leave the caucus room.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, I was also at that Polk County caucus.  It was a flat-out rebuke.  People were laughing at TB&#8217;s blank sheet.  Yes, we realize all of these candidates will get the signatures needed but the coronated winner of the GOP primary should not have blank sheets leave the caucus room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Bregar</title>
		<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2010/01/29/so-much-for-inevitibility/#comment-5429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Bregar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iowadefensealliance.com/?p=4153#comment-5429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know Alicia, I don&#039;t know if Vander Plaats was able to get all of his petition signatures. However what I do know is that I have yet to see his campaign scrambling to solicit those signatures the way Branstad is doing. 

I acknowledged in the post that he would most likely be able to get the minimum number of signatures required, but his campaign has had to resort to enticing people to sign the petitions with items such as campaign buttons and shirts. 

The fact that he was unable to garner enough signatures at the caucueses is a pretty clear indication that he does not have the support of the base of the party. It is also very clear that if he does not win 35% in the primary it is very likely that he will lose the nomination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Alicia, I don&#8217;t know if Vander Plaats was able to get all of his petition signatures. However what I do know is that I have yet to see his campaign scrambling to solicit those signatures the way Branstad is doing. </p>
<p>I acknowledged in the post that he would most likely be able to get the minimum number of signatures required, but his campaign has had to resort to enticing people to sign the petitions with items such as campaign buttons and shirts. </p>
<p>The fact that he was unable to garner enough signatures at the caucueses is a pretty clear indication that he does not have the support of the base of the party. It is also very clear that if he does not win 35% in the primary it is very likely that he will lose the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

