Iowa For Freedom: We Learned it in 2nd Grade

When my daughter was in second grade she started to study the three branches of government and their roles.  She brought home a sheet of paper with three simple words typed on it: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. In her handwriting was the explanation of those three branches.  The Legislative branch makes law, the Executive branch enforces the law, and the Judicial branch holds the law up to the Constitution.  She is now in third grade and upon visiting her room I saw the same information posted on one of the classroom bulletin boards.  This is what my daughter is learning at a very early age but yet seven Iowa judges on April 3, 2009, threw that basic knowledge of the separation of powers out the window along with our freedoms and the integrity of how our government is supposed to work.

Enter Bob Vander Plaats and Iowa For Freedom.  I am going to be honest with you, I have been a Bob Vander Plaats supporter ever since I learned about him on Mike Huckabee’s 2008 presidential campaign.  When he lost the primary in June to former Governor Terry Branstad and the establishment I am one of those who wanted him to run as an Independent just to blow the whole political class up (which still needs to be done, by the way, but it may happen in a way that I never expected).  When Bob announced that he would not run as an Independent but instead continue the crusade of his number one issue, activist courts, I eventually realized that what has always been said was made blatantly true.  It has never been about Bob, but instead, it has been about the issues and he demonstrated that in spades when Iowa For Freedom launched.

Even though Iowa For Freedom is built around the court decision that trampled on the Defense of Marriage Act the movement transcends the marriage issue and is about “we the people.”  Iowa For Freedom is about keeping that balance of power that my daughter learned about in second grade and removing those judges who violate it in order to promote their own agendas.  If they did it with a definition that has been around for ages what else will they think they will have the power to do?  Everything is up for grabs when the final say is left in the hands of un-elected judges who legislate from the bench.

With less than a month before the election Iowa For Freedom is creating waves.  It has had national attention (check out this article which was basically an opinion piece that got a great re-rebuttal) but most importantly the effort is showing in the latest polling.  It is now a toss-up on whether or not these judges will keep their position on the bench and even the liberal medial suggests that if just one judge is removed, which has never been done in Iowa,  it will shock the nation’s political class.  Opponents to Iowa For Freedom argue that judges should not be voted out just because people do not agree with one decision. The news flash is that these judges are being ousted because they did not follow the rules that second graders learn, which is to compare the law to the Constitution.  If that law does not pass the test then the legislature needs to pass a new law that does or let the people amend the Constitution.  Courts do not make law.

The most amusing organization to oppose Iowa For Freedom is a group called Justice Not Politics which just happened to spring up after the latest polling data.  Oh please, this group is led by two POLITICIANS who happen to be two former Lieutenant Governors, Sally Pederson and Joy Corning.  However, I kind of like the name because I also agree that judges should be about justice and not politics.  If the Iowa Supreme Court was worried about justice and not their own political agendas then they wouldn’t have voided a law passed by the people which also has been upheld in thirty other states included liberal California and Maine.  They used the bench and the robe to pass a political agenda that would have never passed the legislature or the people of Iowa.

This is about our freedoms and keeping them in our hands and not in the hands of the courts.  Remember to flip your ballot over and when you see the names of the three Iowa Supreme Court judges up for retention, bring the power back to the people and vote NO in NOvember.

Mike Huckabee’s PAC Invades Iowa

It has been just a week since the Georgia primary run-off for governor in which Nathan Deal emerged with a victory of less than 2,500 votes after entering the race trailing by double digits to his opponent Karen Handel.  Deal was the clear conservative in this race and Huckabee made a late endorsement of  his campaign five days before the run-off against the endorsements of Handel by Mitt Romney and Sarah Palin.  Huckabee made a visit to Georgia on behalf of Deal three days before the election and Palin was there for Handel the day after.  Huckabee also cut robocalls and ads for Deal, but perhaps the biggest factor of the outcome of the election is that Team Huck volunteers from around the country make 3,000 phone calls for Deal before the run-off with 1,000 of those calls going straight into Handel territory where Deal ended up winning by 750 votes.

This is not an unusual situation for Huck PAC and its committed volunteers.  This sort of commitment to endorsed candidates has happened in numerous elections; it just happened under the radar.  Huck PAC’s Executive Director, Hogan Gidley, said it best in a Real Clear politics interview, which is the first major media outlet to actually catch on to the strength of Governor Huckabee’s unconventional PAC which relies more on the people than the pocketbook:

“We do a lot of the things that fly under the D.C. radar like robocalls, get-out-the-vote messages, e-blasts, and things like that,” Gidley said. “And while they’re not something that excites members on the press, the people on the ground who receive the votes and the benefits of the governor’s trust do appreciate it.”

Because Mike Huckabee’s PAC does not raise the money that the other PAC’s do, such as Romney’s, Palin’s, or Tim Pawlenty’s, the media writes it off.  What a lot of people don’t realize, however, is how Huck PAC spends this money compared to the others and how many people are actually donating.  For example, after a conference call with Huck PAC I learned that even though Palin has raised three times as much as Huckabee since January 1, 2009, she only got it with 24,000 donations compared to his 29,000 donations.  What’s the big deal?  Huckabee’s following his greater but they just don’t give nearly as much.  Also, Huck PAC does what a PAC is supposed to and actually gives money to endorsed candidates.  This past filing period it gave a third of its money to the candidates while Romney’s and Palin’s PACs usually hover in the single digit or teen percentages.

Mike Huckabee’s PAC also does something no other major PAC does and that is endorse candidates at the state and local level, which was demonstrated in Iowa yesterday.  We all know that change starts from the bottom up and that is where Huck PAC is making a huge impact.  There were eleven new candidates endorsed yesterday in Iowa and only three of them were for the Federal level and over half of them were not incumbents.  Of those non-incumbents only one of them is going after an open seat (and that was previously held by a Democrat) and the other five are going after the Democrat incumbent, sometimes very entrenched ones and some who are also being funded by Republicans.  These are not easy races which proves that Mike Huckabee is not just going after the winner or the party favorite, but those candidates who hold true to the principles of his PAC.

Huck PAC will support Republican candidates who are passionate advocates for tax reform, a strong national defense, real border security, life, the family, less government, and individual liberty.

Even though Governor Huckabee has won recent 2012  polling both in Iowa and nationally, his efforts are focused on 2010 and electing conservatives nationwide and especially in my great state of Iowa.

Here is a list of the newest Iowa Huck PAC endorsed candidates and their websites.  I hope to follow-up with a post on each of them before election day.

Steve King (U.S. Congress 5th District) http://www.kingforcongress.com/
Tom Latham (U.S. Congress 4th District) http://www.tomlatham.com/
Dwayne Alons (Iowa House 4th District) http://www.iowahouserepublicans.com/members/dwayne-alons
Chris Hagenow (Iowa House 59th District) http://chrishagenow.com/
Jason Schultz (Iowa House 55th District) http://www.iowahouserepublicans.com/members/jason-schultz

Kent Sorenson (running for Iowa Senate 37th District) http://kentsorenson.com/
Kim Pearson (running for Iowa House 42nd District) http://www.kimpearsoniowahouse.com/
Tom Shaw (running for Iowa House 8th District) http://www.electshaw2010.com/
Jane Hodoly (running for Iowa House 93rd District) http://hodolyforhouse.com/
Brenna Findley (running for Iowa Attorney General) http://www.findleyforiowa.com/
Brad Zaun (running for U.S. Congress 3rd District) http://www.bradzaun.com/

Iowa GOP: Divided We Stand…and Proud of it

After the Republican primary on June 8 I had sworn off attending the state GOP convention which would have only been my second convention as I am fairly new to the process.  During my first convention in 2008 I had to control my gag reflex from the realization that John McCain was our nominee and I wasn’t about to endure the same self-inflicted pain by attending this convention with our newly (but yet repeatedly) elected gubernatorial nominee.  I had given up a lot of personal time during the primary and I was going to sacrifice no more of it, especially for a party that was STILL headed down the tubes and too stupid to know any better.

But what got me up on Saturday morning from my family’s camper and made me drive to downtown Des Moines unshowered and unkept was not for the party but to help my fellow patriots send another message to the GOP in Iowa that I knew would once again land on deaf ears, and also to line up behind warriors like State Representative Dwayne Alons in his very lonely quest for principles in the party.

I realized the unprecedented move to nominate Bob Vander Plaats for Lt. Governor from the floor and override Terry Branstad’s choice of Kim Reynolds was a bold one but I had no idea what the outcome would be.  This nomination happened less than a month from a bitter primary in which a former four term governor and standard-bearer of the Republican party spent over 2 million dollars to only get 50% of the vote in a high turn-out primary.  What many Branstad apologists don’t want to admit is that 100% of the voters who went to the polls on June 8 knew who Terry Branstad was and half of them still rejected him.  Bob Vander Plaats did not have the luxury of millions of dollars and high name recognition but he pulled 41% of the vote because of his stance for the Constitution, God’s law, and conservative principles while rejecting politics as usual.

While it is true that Vander Plaats most likely had the most support from convention delegates to be the next governor of Iowa, I thought it would be interesteting to see how the Lt. Governor vote would go since Bob has never really shown a desire to be on the ticket with Branstad unless the former governor would champion some of his issues and Bob never campaigned to the delegates to vote for him for this position.  I also was curious about the outcome of the vote because most of Bob’s supporters don’t want to see him anywhere near Branstad and would rather he run third party.  I can also bet that many of his delegates were fed up with the party and did not attend convention, which was what I was almost guilty of.

When the final tally came in for the choice for Lt. Governor I was shocked to find out that out of over 1,300 votes Vander Plaats only lost to the hand-picked Reynolds by under 200 votes.  This was astonishing because the effort to get Vander Plaats forced on Branstad’s ticket was a small grassroots effort with no money and the party fought back fiercely by pushing Kim Reynolds with numerous robocalls and emails to delegates.  Unprecedented, indeed.  A divided party, indeed.  A message that will be 100% ingnored………..100% likely.  I am told that about 40% of the delegates left before Branstad gave his speech.  I wouldn’t know since I was one of them.

Of the short time I attended the 2010 Iowa Republican Convention here are some observations:

1.  When the gray-haired people pass on there will be no one left except  for the college kids working for the establishment, which are not very reliable since they may go work for the Democrats also if the price is right.
2.  One of the few not white people in the room was heard to be saying, “The unions screwed me, the Democrats screwed me, and now the Republicans screwed me.  Where do I go now?”
3.  I regret my vote to put Steve Scheffler and Kim Lehman in the position of National Committeman and Committeewoman.  One cannot serve two masters.
4.  Steve King, the champion of the Republican base, is slowly becoming what he has been fighting against.
5.  As suspected with John McCain and proven with Terry Branstad, the second place on the ticket is just window dressing to be shaped and molded and for photo-ops.

Because the old guard of the GOP fails to see that the political climate and this next election is not about who endorses who or a single candidate but instead about the issues and preserving our republic for our children, they will continue to drown in their own irrelevancy while most of us move on.  When Terry Branstad was asked if he was worried about the base not falling in line he responded, “Who else are they going to vote for?”  What he doesn’t realize that the decision looming ahead of us is not who we are going to vote for but how we are going to change our voter registrations.  “Independent” or “no party affiliation” is the tough choice I have to make next and not who I am going to vote for in November because whoever wins, we still lose.

Why IDA is Supporting Bob Vander Plaats for Governor of Iowa

Have you ever taken a good look at our country and state and wonder where it all went wrong?  How it got to the point that it has?  Are you fed up?  I know we would all like to blame President Obama and Governor Culver, but the truth is that just as much blame lands in the lap of the Republican party and its leaders.  A party that used to stand for something, but now stands for nothing except how to get through the next election cycle because the position that is supposed to be about serving people has now become a career in which politicians can stuff their pockets and become power brokers with our money, our property, and our freedoms.

However, there is a candidate out there who is nothing like that.  His name is Bob Vander Plaats and he is running for Governor of Iowa against a type of politician that I described above, Terry Branstad.  Bob is not a member of the party establishment that both sides of the aisle are fed up with.  He has no ties to the Republican party machine that the Democrats can use against him and he pays no allegiance to the lobbyists and business cronies that stuff  politicians’ pockets in hopes that they will sell-out their constituents.  Bob is a businessman who was once a teacher, a principal, and a CEO and who loves this state and sees the same things happening to it that we are, and that is why he is running for governor.

Bob Vander Plaats’ feet are firmly planted in the Constitution and the Republican party platform.  His agenda as Governor of Iowa shows us that he has a commitment to education that will restore local control to schools and to parents instead of the government.  His economic ideas stem from growing businesses and bringing new ideas and jobs into the state instead of selling out to the gambling industry or government subsidized programs.  His commitment to the Constitution is demonstrated in his recognition that the Federal Government is reaching beyond its scope and that it is not fulfilling its duty to protect our borders.  He also realizes that the activist courts are eroding our freedoms and need to be put in check.  He is unwavering in the areas of protecting life at all stages and holding on to the bedrock of our society; traditional marriage.  “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” mean something to him.

Fed up?  Join the members of Iowa Defense Alliance and vote for Bob Vander Plaats for Governor of Iowa in the Republican primary on June 8.  Learn more about Bob on his website and join him on facebook and twitter.  Our state is worth it.

Kim Pearson for Iowa House district 42 and Wes Enos for State Senate district 21

It has been a great primary season so far and one of the things that has made it so great is that I actually have two solid Republicans running in my district for both the Iowa House and the State Senate.  In 2008 my Democratic state representative didn’t even have a challenger and my Democratic state senator has been in the legislature since 1983, so having two promising conservatives to challenge them is refreshing.

Kim Pearson is running for Iowa House district 42 to take on Geri Huser in the fall.  Kim is a strong conservative born from the movement that has been happening to take back our state and our nation from not only the left but from the GOP party establishment that has aided and embedded the liberals to dismantle our republic.  She is anything but a politician, but instead someone who deeply cares about our state and the direction it is going and has stepped up to the call to do something about it.  She is a conservative who stands for all principles of the Republican party:  freedom for the people, tax reform, reduced spending, state’s rights, life, traditional marriage, 2nd Amendment, Right to Work, and excellence in education.  Kim is in the primary on June 8 and I encourage you to learn about her on her website and to read Caffeinated Thoughts where there is another great article on her.

Wes Enos is running for State Senate district 21 to take on Dennis Black in the fall.  Wes is unique in that even though he has never held an elected public office he has extensive experience in working with the grassroots in various campaigns and serving on the State Central Committee.  He definitely knows the concerns and desires of the everyday Iowan and is well aware of the political climate through his contact with the boots on the ground.  Wes is also a conservative who stands for all principles of the GOP and knows that all issues must be addressed in order for the Republican party to succeed.  Wes in the June 8 primary and I encourage you to check him out on his website.  I believe the State Senate is lacking Republican leadership and Wes would be a much needed addition.

These are two strong candidates running in the Polk and Jasper county areas and we need them to take on Geri Huser and Dennis Black in the fall so that our state can start reversing the nightmare it is in right now.

Branstad Bunch: Same names, same games

Guest commentary by Current Resident.

My mail box has been crowded lately with campaign materials for and against Terry Branstad, Republican primary candidate for Governor.

“Terry Branstad was a liberal’s liberal.”

“Liberal Terry Branstad would make Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi proud.”

“One of the best liberal governors this state has ever had.” David Yepsen

And then the Former Governor has sent out his own materials to let me know that he “will stand strong for TRADITIONAL IOWA VALUES.” Also, that he is the “REAL conservative change that Iowa needs now.”

The unflattering materials have a “Paid for by Iowans for Responsible Government” return address. Some checking finds information about this group via the Iowa Independent.

The liberal front group is going after Branstad and the Branstad bunch is not happy about it. Payback time for anti Culver ads.

The calls for disclosure echo those by Democrats in regards to the conservative nonprofit Iowa Progress Project. The group, which is registered as a 501(c)4 nonprofit, does not have to disclose its donors, something Democrats have taken exception to, calling the group “a secret political slush fund that lacks the honesty or integrity to reveal their campaign contributors.”

Iowa Progress Project has close ties to a number of current and former Branstad aides.

And after more reading I have decided my mail box is being stuffed due to a battle of Democrats against the moderate, establishment Republicans at work.

This site takes you to this site which takes you to the Iowa Democrats  Face book page.

Some of the information from Iowa Knows Better:

May 5, 2010
Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Michael Kiernan released the statement below following Terry Branstad’s comments regarding open records and transparency in state government to the Des Moines Register editorial board this morning.

“Branstad should be familiar with self-dealing cronies after his own Chief of Staff Doug Gross made millions lobbying the state government. Or maybe Branstad’s memory isn’t serving him well anymore; he ‘forgot’ about ever discussing the Clarinda prison project with Gross.

“Branstad’s administration was one of the most cozy, back-scratching operations in the history of state government. His appointees mirrored his donor list.

State Paid $160 Million Over Five Years To Clients of Law Firm Of Branstad’s Former Chief of Staff “The ethics investigation was accompanied by the release of a report by (State Auditor Richard) Johnson and (state Treasurer Michael) Fitzgerald, the state auditor and treasurer, on state government contracts with businesses represented by the Brown Winick firm as well as direct payments to the firm for legal services.  In all, the state paid more than $160 million over five years to clients of the law firm. Most of the money—$96 million—was paid to MFS Technologies for construction of the statewide fiber-optic network. The state spends a lot on private contractors. In 1993 alone, Iowa spent more than $200 million just on service contracts.”  (Des Moines Register, September 22, 2002)

The Iowa Knows Better group has done their homework on Terry Branstad.

It is a rather tangled web. Tangled up are names like Doug Gross and Mitt Romney and Terry Branstad. These three names and probably more names are all the more reason for Iowans to do their own research. Yes an important incentive for Iowa primary voters to really understand who comes along for the ride with Terry Branstad.

More of the same names and same faces from the last go around.

No thank you.

Mitt Romney Rallying the Base in the Iowa GOP Gubernatorial Primary

Today it was announced that Mitt Romney has thrown his support behind Terry Branstad in the Iowa Governor’s race.  Really not surprising since most of Branstad’s campaign staff and the people he associates with are Romney people.  What is surprising is that Mitt decided to enter into this messy primary which is something he is not known to do.  Could it be because Mike Huckabee has endorsed Branstad’s rival in the race, Bob Vander Plaats?

This endorsement is a stupid move for Mitt Romney and the Branstad campaign.  Let’s think back to the 2008 Iowa Caucuses and the crushing defeat that Huckabee delivered Romney that shocked the nation and turned politics as usual upside-down.  Huckabee was out spent 15 to 1 but still won by almost ten points because Iowans rejected the candidate of Mitt Romney and his message that they were seeing and hearing for almost a year.  Spending a lot of money on advertising and stuffing mailboxes was no match for the grassroots effort that propelled the former Governor of Arkansas and Baptist minister to a decisive victory.  The base rallied to eliminate Mitt Romney from the Presidential race to instead launch someone of principles and conviction.

This is why once again Mitt Romney will rally the base in Iowa, however, it will most likely be against his candidate of choice in the gubernatorial primary and not for.  Romney could spark the get out the vote needed to push Bob Vander Plaats over the top to victory because if there is one things Iowan have proved, they are not bought and paid for.

This is a un-needed endorsement for the Branstad campaign and the slogan of “with friends like that, who needs enemies” sure does seem to fit.  The Iowa voter does not need to see the similarities between these two candidates if Branstad is going to succeed in securing the nomination.  Similarities such as both of them raising taxes and “fees” (that way we don’t need to call them taxes), Romney writing the blue print for ObamaCare and Branstad campaigning for the deciding vote on ObamaCare,  Romney signing into law $50 taxpayer-funded abortions and Branstad putting a Planned Parenthood cheerleader on the ticket with him, Romney taking a court opinion and making same-sex marriage a “law” and Branstad surrendering to the courts on making same-sex marriage a “law,” and finally, Romney employing illegal immigrants at his house and Branstad not willing to take a stand for Iowa on illegal immigration.

With friends like that, who needs enemies.  They rallying of the base has begun.

What Does a Front-runner Look Like?

I really don’t know a concrete answer to that question, however, I do know what a front-runner does NOT look like.  He does not look like Republican gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad at the Cedar Rapids debate last week.  He pulled a couple of stunts that looked like a drowning man grasping for a life-preserver.

First there was the party unity question in which he basically gave Bob Vander Plaats a free pass to hammer him on.  If you have ever endorsed a Democrat like Branstad has I would recommend  not going around touting that you have always supported the Republican party.  Never mind that this Democrat he endorsed from the sleeper state of Nebraska became an overnight sensation when he sold out to ObamaCare for some silver.  That is a skeleton that Terry Branstad thought would probably never fall out of the closet and if it did, it wouldn’t be connected to the biggest government takeover in history.

Bob Vander Plaats smashing him in the head with this endorsement had to sting, but if Branstad really is the front-runner then he should have just let it slide and not get in the mud.  By lashing out at Vander Plaats, he basically put a big “guilty” on his forehead and allowed Vander Plaats to walk away untouched as the one who really attempted to unite the party.

Next is the controversy on Vander Plaats’ Executive Order that would stay gay marriage until correct Constitutional action could be taken.  The Executive Order is something the Branstad people have shrugged off as illegal and stupid.  If this is the case, then why did he lower himself to an outburst about it while Vander Plaats was talking about it?  A front-runner who is faced with an issue that supposedly has no traction, like they claim about Vander Plaats’ Executive Order, leaves the response from his opponent go.  But instead Branstad interrupts Vander Plaats with an example from the Governor Vilsack days of an Executive Order that he was sued over.  This led Vander Plaats to respond and to get the last word in. 

There is some discussion that the two candidates were talking about two different Executive Orders from Vilsack but it really doesn’t matter because both of them were unconstitutional because they both attempted to make law.  Vander Plaats’ Executive Order does not make law but instead encourages the system of making law to legally proceed.  This heated exchange made it look like Branstad had a senile moment because he in no way clarified what he was talking about with the Vilsack example (he couldn’t clarify because it was an outburst during a time when he wasn’t supposed to be speaking) and Vander Plaats looked like a Governor in command of the situation.

After the debate Terry Branstad still carried on his attack on Bob Vander Plaats which is what the media picked up on out of the debate.  Perhaps after seeing and hearing that footage the public also saw a drowning man grasping for a life-preserver or maybe they just saw an era of days gone by slide down the tubes.

What a front-runner does NOT look like.

The Danny Carroll Before and After

After this hit piece appeared by Craig Robinson on The Iowa Republican regarding Iowa Family Policy Center’s Danny Carroll two thoughts immediately came to my mind:

1.  What the IFPC is doing is working and the party hacks are running scared of Bob Vander Plaats.

2.  The article accurately displayed who Danny Carroll WAS and that is member extraordinaire of the Republican machine.

My beef with Craig’s hit piece was that nowhere in there did it include anything about Danny Carroll between November of 2008 and today.  Somewhere in there Mr. Carroll left the machine behind and no one knows but him and his Creator what was in his heart during that time.  Craig so eloquently threw Bible verses around in his article but he forgot to mention the word repentance.  I might also add that Craig seems to think that all Christians should sit in a circle and sing Kumbaya together since our Savior came showing love and gentle guidance to all.  But did He?  I also remember this same Jesus flipping over the money changers tables in the temple.

I was going to write a post addressing all of this but I received a note from Danny Carroll in an IFPC email that says it all:

On Monday of this week, Republican blogger Craig Robinson wrote an article that detailed several things about my past political involvement. While he was making an obvious attempt to criticize, much of what he said was exactly right. Mitt Romney came to my farm and spoke at a fundraiser for my legislative campaign, as did John McCain, and Newt Gingrich. He neglected to include Terry Branstad, who also attended an event for me in 2008.

Craig rightly pointed out that I played that game — all the way. I was the conventional Republican; I played it safe and followed all the rules. I spoke up when asked, and kept quiet when told. I took the money from the Team Iowa PAC, which is funded in no small part by folks like Bruce Rastetter and Gary Kirke, as did every other Republican leader.

While I don’t recall refusing help from Steve King, as Craig claims in his article, that too would indicate I was playing by the standard Republican rules. You see, while most Republican insiders will say polite things about Representative King in public, they caution each other in private to be careful and not get to close to a firebrand who wears his religion on his sleeve like King often does. They are afraid that people might then think the entire party is lurching to the right or becoming too religious. Did I hear and listen to that type of “conventional wisdom” while serving as a loyal Republican soldier? Guilty as charged!

Steve King has taken a lot of stands that other political figures are too scared to take. Over the last several months, I have learned firsthand some of what he has gone through for those principled stands. We are all human, we all make mistakes, and sometimes we need to ask for forgiveness. I left a message for the Congressman yesterday afternoon, and look forward to letting him know that I have a new appreciation for the way he keeps fighting in the face of opposition, even when that opposition comes from political pragmatists like I used to be.

Still, Craig’s article begs the question, where did that get us? I know exactly where it got us. It got us bigger government, higher taxes, more Iowa babies killed in the womb, the teachers union running education instead of parents, and it got us a Supreme Court that thinks they can make law. It got us criticism from people like Doug Gross, Joy Corning, and their friends. It got us big money political elites that sit in the background and seemingly pull the strings on people like Craig Robinson.

They tell Christian conservatives to run along and play Sunday School and to sit in the back of the bus while the pros take care of the serious business of politics. They make their decisions based on polls and the amount of money a candidate has in the bank. They are happy to use politicians like pawns in their personal chess game, but when it comes time for a real fight they are AWOL.

On April 3, 2009 the political elites were nowhere to be found. When distraught Iowans came to the Capitol begging for a vote on a constitutional amendment, they were either gone or hiding behind their office doors hoping no reporter would call. When Iowans rose up by the thousands to push back against the Supreme Court, most politicians stayed at a safe distance.

People like Craig Robinson, who has for years made his living off of the political process, appear to be afraid that if Christians and principled conservatives refuse to participate in the system as it now exists, the gravy train will dry up. They want us to sit down, shut up, and go along. They want people to believe that the real political power is reserved for those who can get as close as possible to office holders and people with lots of money, because that’s the way it has always worked. Their system continues to enrich and empower them, if we all buy into the paradigm where everyone needs to angle for access to the political class, and they deternine who gets that access.

There is little room in the current paradigm for personal growth or spiritual development. There is little room for Christian values, convictions, or taking a stand for decency and obedience to God’s commands. Politics no longer has much of anything to do with justice in government or promoting righteousness. I believe George Washington was right when he said, “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensible supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness.” It makes me wonder if Doug Gross and Craig Robinson would have advised Washington to get his thinking straight, that it would be better to protect the status quo, and just get along with King George?

Craig also decided to quote scripture as a way to undermine the progress that has been made over the last several months. He likes Colossians 4:5-6 and 2 Timothy 2:24-26, and so do I, but he failed to contrast them with other passages like Matthew 10:34 and Matthew 10:22, where Jesus said, “Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword,” and “you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.”

Those who are married to the current political paradigm of pragmatism need to understand, we are fighting for a better paradigm and will not be deterred. We are fighting, first and foremost, because we understand that every human is an eternal being and that each one of us will answer for what we did and said in this life when we face Jesus. (Another Scripture reference that is worth a quick look is Philippians 2:9-11) We are more concerned about waking up Christians who have made, or are in danger of making, an idol of a political party, than we are about who will win the next election.

That is the whole point of everything the Iowa Family PAC staff and I have done and said regarding Terry Branstad over the last several months. While we don’t think that anyone needs to be governor for 20 years, we are more concerned with the fact that someone who ought to know better, would presume to employ political pragmatism at a point in history that demands bold leadership based on Christian principles. We have said all along that our hope is that Terry Branstad would have a transformational awakening and articulate an understanding of the failure of the past paradigm, along with a desire to honor God in every decision, should he find himself as Iowa’s governor again.

That is also why it is not hypocritical for me to say and do the things I have over the last several months. In fact, my background and past associations are proof that I know what I’m talking about. People who have participated in a failed political paradigm, and who have supported partisan politics over principled leadership, can change. I look at people like Terry Branstad and Craig Robinson, and have no hatred or ill intent, because I was once there too! I’ve come to terms with the way I used to be, and readily admit that it was wrong. Now, I’m sounding the alarm for other Christians who have allowed themselves to be misled, and am looking for political leaders with the guts to admit it’s time to change the way we conduct ourselves in the political arena.

I know some people don’t like what I have to say or the way I apply what I’m saying, but I did not pick this fight. Throughout history, Christians have often been forced to take a stand, and now is as good a time as any to step up and break with a system that has got us nothing other than bondage. Defending marriage is worth the sacrifice. Protecting the unborn, with more than token efforts designed to appease the populace and that still enables the abortion mills, is worth the sacrifice. Fighting to restore a society where families, churches, and neighborhoods care for the needs of others, rather than feeding an ever growing government, is worth the sacrifice. Abandoning the type of politics that elevates politicians and limits access to the process, in favor of a paradigm that honors God and empowers people, is worth the sacrifice.

The party-above-all Republicans can go ahead and do their thing, but they will not have my support. I have chosen my political hill to fight, and perhaps to die on. What is yours? Do you have a cause for which you are willing to die politically? Most liberals and moderates do not. For them it is mostly about money, power and control.

I believe people are looking for leadership that is based on time tested Biblical values. If people like Craig Robinson, Terry Branstad, or Doug Gross don’t like that, they need to tell us what their standard is. They should stop pretending like their system will promote people and policies that will honor a Biblical standard. They need to explain to everyone what their standard is, if they have one.

Danny Carroll – IFPC Action Board Chairman

Iowa, Please Follow Texas’ Lead

Tax Day is looming tomorrow and you know what that means.  TEA PARTIES.  In light of that the state of Texas has had media attention, from Governor Mike Huckabee in particular, for their bold new initiative Contract with Texas which many Texas legislatures have signed.  Conservative legislators in Texas have banded together to form a new organization – the Independent Conservative Republicans of Texas which was founded by Senator Dan Patrick of Houston.

Our Contract with Texas

We give our word to stand for conservative principles
and to put people before party.

We give our word to be fiscally accountable,
limit the size of government,
and fight for free market principles.

We give our word to protect our borders
and to support a strong military.

We give our word to protect life, support strong family values,
and uphold the Judeo-Christian beliefs our nation was founded upon.

We give our word to defend the Constitution
and protect the sovereign rights of Texas.

I really like this contract and would love it if Iowa would do the same thing.  It would also be beneficial to the conservative movement if this contract went national and the Tea Parties got on board with it.  It is actually standards in simple terms that we can hold politicians accountable to and it covers ALL of the issues that are important to limited government and a free republic.

For more information on this movement Mike Huckabee will have the founder on his Fox News show this weekend.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers